The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not have any fact at each time and place specified in the facts charged of this case, or went back to the near, and even though there was no fact of theft of money and valuables due to intrusion upon the legal party as stated in the facts charged, the lower court convicted all of the facts charged of this case. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts

2. The court below rejected the defendant's assertion in detail on the lower part of the "a summary of evidence" of the court's judgment with the same argument as the grounds for appeal in this case. If we look at the above judgment of the court below in detail compared with the records, the court below's judgment is just and it is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.