logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.01.12 2015구합1342
해임처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff on April 2, 2015 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 10, 2005, the Plaintiff was appointed as early childhood education and full-time instructors at B University on March 10, 2005. Around 2008, the Plaintiff was promoted as an assistant professor and served until March 2015.

B. On December 30, 2014, the early childhood Education Department of the Plaintiff at B University requested the fact-finding committee to hold the Plaintiff’s misconducts (including the following acts of corruptions 1, 2, and 3) from among the four prospective graduates of early childhood education and the three-year junior college. 2) On January 8, 2015, six prospective graduates of B University from early childhood Education and the three-year junior junior junior junior college submitted a petition for the Plaintiff’s misconducts (including the following acts of corruptions 1, 2, and 3) to Jeonnam-do, and Jeonnam-do demanded that the Plaintiff conduct a fact-finding.

C. On January 5, 2015, the fact-finding committee and the investigating B University organized the fact-finding committee as C, investigators D, E, F, G, H, and I. On March 4, 2015, the fact-finding committee submitted a fact-finding report on the fact-finding committee (hereinafter “the result of the fact-finding committee”) stating that “The fact-finding committee submitted the fact-finding committee’s investigation at a meeting of six times from January 19, 2015 to February 23, 2015” that “the causes for severe disciplinary action (excluding dismissal) against the Plaintiff are recognized” as follows.

The defendant's dismissal 1) In accordance with the results of the fact-finding on March 6, 2015, the president of the B University, on March 6, 2015, the plaintiff committed the following misconducts (hereinafter "each of the instant misconducts").

) On the ground that the teachers’ disciplinary resolution was low, the teachers’ disciplinary resolution was requested to the teachers’ disciplinary committee. [Attachment to each of the instant misconduct] A] There was a violation of Article 48 (Duty of Good Faith) of the Local Public Officials Act, Article 18 (Organization of Teaching Hours Table) of the Regulations on the Implementation of School Regulations, Article 7 (Appointment of Teaching Staff) of the former Teachers’ Service Regulations (hereinafter “Act No. 1) and Article 7 (Appointment of Teaching Staff”) during the semester of 2014.

arrow