logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.02.13 2013구단10934
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. On November 11, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision that constitutes a non-conformity of the requirements for a person who rendered distinguished services to the State against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 12, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Army and discharged from military service on May 27, 2013.

B. On May 30, 2013, the Plaintiff asserted that he/she was diagnosed as He/she was diagnosed as He/she was diagnosed as He/she was given a post-satis disc (Baek 2-3), sexual reciting type, and external personality frame (hereinafter “the instant wounds”), and filed an application for registration with the Defendant on May 30, 2013.

C. Accordingly, on November 11, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision to grant a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the causal link between the instant wounds and the military performance of official duties is not recognized.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 through 5, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. On March 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that, while undergoing new training at the Army Training Center after entering the training center, the Plaintiff was slicked from stairs during the course of moving to a police officer training, and was seriously shocked, but did not receive medical treatment at the training center.

Even after the assignment of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff received the latter half-time education on May 2012, and was diagnosed as the instant difference due to severe pains on the part of the Plaintiff.

Therefore, the defendant's disposition that did not recognize the causal relationship with the military branch of this case is unlawful.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. On March 2012, 2012, the Plaintiff complained of severe pains during the process of moving to a training site at the Army Training Center for Police Officers (hereinafter “instant accident”). As such, the Plaintiff complained of severe pains during the process of moving to a training site (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) On May 2012, the Plaintiff diagnosed the Gun hospital as a simple salt base and a tension. Then, the Gun hospital conducted a diagnosis as the Gun hospital training unit of the 22th unit of the Boar Disease around 2012.

arrow