1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 2, 2012, the Plaintiff (B) entered the Air Force and discharged the Plaintiff from active service on April 5, 2013.

B. On July 16, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant, asserting that “the Plaintiff sustained an injury from which the left-hand side was increased among the Do roads in the military service on July 7, 2012, and thereafter, on September 2012 and December 2012, 2012, the Plaintiff had a pain-free practice while performing a military-related practice for the preparation of the military-affiliated alliance, and the left-hand slot team and the left-hand slot team (hereinafter “instant injury”).”

C. On February 4, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision to the Plaintiff on February 4, 2014, on the ground that the instant wound did not have a causal relationship with the military performance of official duties, on the grounds that there was no causal relationship with the person who rendered distinguished services to the State and the person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter collectively referred to

On May 1, 2014, while filing the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiff filed an appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on May 1, 2014, but the said commission dismissed the said appeal on October 8, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, 4, Eul evidence 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Plaintiff 1) In light of the fact that the Plaintiff, while serving in the military around July 2012, when doing so, was suffering from the instant wound due to the Maee-Mae-Mae-Mae-Mae-Mae-Mae-Mae-Ma, various trainings and other operations on September 2012 and December 2012, the Plaintiff passed a physical examination without any longer time before entering the military. (2) In light of the fact that the Plaintiff was ordinarily undergoing a new training, etc., even if the Plaintiff had received a military mae-Mae-Mae-Mae-Ma.

In particular, kneneo, kneneo, etc., is not a difference that may occur due to natural progress, and the Plaintiff prepared a knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-gel-gel-gel-gel-gel-gel-gel-gel-gel-gel