Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of assaulting is acquitted. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the prosecution is instituted.

The non-guilty part (Bodily Injury)

1. The Defendant is the victim D(n, 87 years old) children, and the victim E(47 years old) is the birth of the Defendant.

On October 28, 2016, the Defendant, at around 16:00, injured the Defendant on the right f apartment house in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 205 Dong 605, in the victim D’s residence, where the Defendant made a provisional registration on the apartment owned by the victim, and caused the injury to the Defendant on the right float, requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, by taking a dispute over the Defendant’s provisional registration on the apartment house owned by the victim D.

Accordingly, the defendant injured a lineal ascendant victim.

2. Among the facts charged in the instant case, there is a statement at each police station in the victim D, E, and G as evidence showing that the continued injury is consistent with the facts charged.

D's statement at the police station, D's first, with the police station "I ambling for children, I ambling for 2 hours now."

Han's first desire to cause son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's

“The following facts acknowledged by the record,” namely, D, in fact, had been treated at the hospital around the right eye on September 2, 2016, and had no hole around the snow at the time of the instant case. As such, D’s stuff argument is not a fact, and D, upon diagnosis of dementia around 201, continued to provide medical treatment after the diagnosis of dementia, and there was a symptoms such as believing that there was a proof of reliance on the virtual fact as true at the time of appraisal, and talking with it repeatedly.