The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 06:30 on July 12, 2012, the Defendant loaned KRW 200,000 to the victim D (the age of 57) before the 107 Dong-dong 906, the building C, but the victim was not able to pay the money, and the victim expressed “one-years and ten-years” to the victim, “the victim was able to enter the house, and the victim was faced with the wall by cutting down the arms of the defective victim, and was faced with the wall, and the victim was faced with the right side, etc. requiring two weeks medical treatment.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that while D's husband and wife are in the situation of D's husband and wife at D's home, the defendant and the defendant wanting to tear the loan certificate and a certificate of personal seal impression from the defendant and they do not inflict any injury on D in order to prevent the defendant from doing so.

3. The following circumstances acknowledged by the judgment unit, the defendant's legal statement, the witness D, the fact-finding report, the fact-finding inquiry report (F hospital), and the following circumstances, namely, the injury diagnosis report include only the part of D's injury, and the witness D makes a statement that "D's damage was not caused by the wall, but the defendant was plucked, plucked, or dried," and D's witness made a statement that "D's damage was caused by a plucked, plucked, or dried," and D used a prescription at a hospital for its treatment." However, the fact-finding report (F hospital) stated that "D's damage was caused by a witness's injury" and "D's injury was caused by a witness's injury."