The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the grounds for appeal, the punishment imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, in light of the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the defendant, and that the defendant is in the position to support his wife and her three children.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the Defendant has been punished several times for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (five times a fine and one time a suspended sentence of imprisonment) and the Road Traffic Act (one time a suspended sentence of imprisonment). In particular, on August 1, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years a suspended sentence on August 9, 2013 due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act or a violation of the Road Traffic Act (one time a suspended sentence of imprisonment) and two years a suspended sentence of eight months, and the judgment became final and conclusive and conclusive on August 9, 2013, and did not go two months from the date of the suspended sentence, and thus repeated the Defendant’s drinking and unlicensed driving in the instant case. In light of the above records, the Defendant’s past records of drinking driving as well as the other person’s life and body need to be strictly punished in accordance with the amended Road Traffic Act, and the Defendant’s repeated force as seen above, it is difficult to expect the Defendant’s punishment and the effect of the Defendant’s aforementioned crime after considering the circumstances and circumstances.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.