The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant is led to confession, reflect, and not repeating the case. In light of the fact that the defendant is at a position to support a woman suffering from dementia and a brue who is suffering from dementia, and a child attending a graduate school, the punishment imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, even if the Defendant asserts, there exists a history of punishment several times due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (4 times of fine and one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment). In particular, in the Changwon District Court's assistance on December 26, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to two months of suspended sentence due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (4 times of suspended sentence) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (4 months of suspended sentence). On January 3, 2012, the judgment became final and conclusive and conclusive on January 3, 2012, and even during the suspended sentence period, repeated driving and unauthorized driving of the instant case, which may cause damage to the life and body of others as well as the driving of the Defendant. In light of the above records, the Defendant's repeated punishment alone does not make it difficult to expect the effect of the Defendant to drive under influence and drive under the influence of alcohol, and the circumstances and circumstances leading up to the Defendant's argument after the Defendant's oral argument and unfair sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.