logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 12. 10. 선고 2015두50139 판결
(심리불속행)원고들에게는 후발적 경정사유가 존재함[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2014Nu69329 (Law No. 21, 2015)

Title

(C) If there is a ground for subsequent correction for the plaintiff

Summary

(1) In the event that there are grounds for subsequent correction (a judgment) under the Framework Act on National Taxes and the grounds for correction have occurred prior to the disposition rejecting correction, it would be deemed that the disposition agency should judge whether the grounds are legitimate or not in accordance with the purport of subsequent request for correction.

Related statutes

Article 45-2 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

2015du50139 Revocation of revocation of revocation of inheritance tax rectification

Plaintiff-Appellant

KimA

Defendant-Appellee

BB Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2014Nu69329 Decided July 21, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

December 10, 2015

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Trial Procedure, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow