Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court 2014Nu69329 (Law No. 21, 2015)
Title
(C) If there is a ground for subsequent correction for the plaintiff
Summary
(1) In the event that there are grounds for subsequent correction (a judgment) under the Framework Act on National Taxes and the grounds for correction have occurred prior to the disposition rejecting correction, it would be deemed that the disposition agency should judge whether the grounds are legitimate or not in accordance with the purport of subsequent request for correction.
Related statutes
Article 45-2 of the Framework Act on National Taxes
Cases
2015du50139 Revocation of revocation of revocation of inheritance tax rectification
Plaintiff-Appellant
KimA
Defendant-Appellee
BB Director of the Tax Office
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2014Nu69329 Decided July 21, 2015
Imposition of Judgment
December 10, 2015
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Trial Procedure, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.