logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.08.08 2013고정345
수산자원관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who gets on board a ship as the captain of an inshore fishing vessel D (7.31 ton) in the military vessel owned by C.

No one shall engage in the fishing of inshore fishing within a zone in which operation of inshore fishing is prohibited.

Nevertheless, from January 19, 2013 to 13:05, the Defendant 3 mar (3:00 mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar. mar mar mar

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second court date);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of 12 copies of documentary evidence photographs at the time of detection;

1. Article 65 subparagraph 2 of the Fishery Resources Management Act and Article 15 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserted that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is only the Defendant engaged in the test operation. However, in light of the fact that the Defendant was on board D before two months prior to the date and time when four seafarers were on board, the above argument is difficult to accept.

When considering all circumstances, such as the defendant's career, criminal record, etc., a fine for summary order shall be imposed by the same fine as it is difficult to consider excessive.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow