Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 11, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for three months at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 19, 2018.

1. On June 6, 2017, the Defendant boarded the victim as if he/she had an intention or ability to pay KRW 170,000 of the taxi fare on the way front of the Seo-gu change in Daejeon Special Metropolitan City (58 Do) on the way prior to the 18:00 on June 6, 2017, by deceiving the victim as if he/she had an intention or ability to pay the 170,000 won of the taxi fare. On the same day, the Defendant did not pay the cab fee to the victim even if he/she arrived on the front of the F hotel located in Jung-gu

2. On August 14, 2017, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) taken a taxi in the name of the Plaintiff G (hereinafter referred to as “victim G”) on the front side of the department store; (b) induced the victim as if he/she had an intent or ability to pay 156,40 won of taxi charges on the front side of the department store; and (c) did not pay the said taxi charges to the victim, even though he/she arrived on the front side of the earth, such as Seo-gu, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City, No. 1566, 104, and oil, which is for the purpose of 0:10 on the following day.

3. On August 28, 2017, around 23:30, the Defendant: (a) taken a victim I (57 tax) on the way near the Seoul Gwangju Made Station; (b) had the intent or ability to pay the 167,300 won of the taxi fee, deceiving the victim as if he/she had the intention or ability to pay the 167,300 won of the taxi fee; and (c) did not pay the said cab fee to the victim even if he/she arrived on the front of the Daejeon-gu, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City, the purpose of which is around 01:

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victims, acquired a total amount of 493,700 won in property interest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A written statement of G and I;

1. The 112 reported case handling table and the taxi receipt, respectively; and

1. Previous convictions: Application of text of judgment and case search Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of fraud and the selection of fines);

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code for the treatment of concurrent crimes, provided that Article 39 Section 1.1.