1. As to the Plaintiff, as to the buildings listed in the attached list:

A. Defendant B is kept in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office.

1. Basic facts

A. D newly constructed a building on the land of 800 square meters in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, which is owned by E (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. D As of October 30, 1964, died and jointly succeeded by wife G and its children H, Plaintiff, I, J, and K. G due to the death of G, H, I, J, and K, and the Plaintiff was succeeded to the instant building through an agreement on the division of inherited property.

C. After succeeding to the instant building, the Plaintiff paid the property tax while residing in the instant building. The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the owner of the instant building and paid the land rental fee each year.

On the other hand, on April 6, 198, on the ground of the transfer of ownership (such as ownership) to the ledger for the management of unauthorized buildings of this case, the ownership transfer registration was made from Defendant B on January 17, 1989 on the ground of the transfer of ownership (such as ownership, etc.) from the network D on May 9, 198, and the transfer of ownership (such as ownership, etc.) from Defendant C on May 13, 198.

E. The instant building is included in the scope of unauthorized buildings for which compensation is paid to the owner when demolished due to urban planning projects, etc. in accordance with the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ordinance on Compensation for Unauthorized Building Maintenance Business.

[Reasons for Recognition] The fact that there is no dispute as to Defendant B against Defendant C who is deemed as a confession

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the registration of change of the name of the owner in the name of the Defendants shall be deemed null and void. Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to implement the registration procedure for change of the name of the owner in the unauthorized Building Management Register kept in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.