1. The Defendants jointly pay KRW 78,800,000 to the Plaintiff and the interest rate thereon from August 12, 2016 to the day of full payment.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants, etc., knowing the fact that the investors paid a certain subscription fee to E company and join the E company as a member, and then, they automatically accumulated cyber money in cash, and that there is a system that pays recommendation allowances and support allowances in the event of soliciting other investors, they were aware that there is a system that pays recommendation allowances and support allowances, with the awareness that there is a system that allows a large number of investors to open the E company and invest funds, have a 200% profit for 52 weeks or more.” The Defendants, etc. received money from investors by soliciting the investment.

B. On June 15, 2014, at the husband’s office of Defendant C located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Defendant C gave a strong instruction to the effect that “E is a company operating the world’s largest Internet shopping mall. B is the head of the headquarters of the E company, and C is the head of the headquarters, who is the head of the headquarters of the E company, and may be responsible for 52 weeks if the E company invests in the E company, and may obtain 200% or more of its trust and investment that reduces its profits.” The Defendant C recommended business explanation and investment on July 21, 2014, and received KRW 98,80,000 from the Plaintiff on August 21, 2014.

C. Defendant B and C did not have concluded a business contract with the above company related to the Korean branch office or agency, and thus could not engage in normal business for the above company. Since the above company could not artificially attract investors in the way of dives to receive recommendation allowances and support allowances, the above company could not guarantee investors more than 200% of profits. Even if receiving money from investors, the above company did not transfer most of the money to the above company, but it was thought to use it in the way of return such as appropriating most of the money paid to the existing investors, and thus, it could reduce the same profits as they promised.