logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.11.18 2014고단2990
장물취득
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and Defendant B purchased a smartphone, which is a stolen for taxi articles, and sold money. Defendant B attached a taxi that sees the transfer, etc. of a smartphone on the road, and Defendant A conspired to directly purchase a smartphone, which is a stolen, from another taxi engineer listed on the taxi.

Defendants around 01:30 on July 21, 2014, around 01:0, the roads in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Defendant B attached a F taxi driven by Defendant E, and Defendant A purchased KRW 220,000 of the price with knowledge of the fact that the victim G was lost from the above taxi on July 19, 2014.

B. On July 21, 2014, the Defendants: (a) around 02:40, the roads in front of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City; (b) Defendant B attached a H taxi driven by C; and (c) Defendant A purchased at KRW 30,00 of the price with knowledge that the victim I lost from the above taxi on July 18, 2014, by other C, the victim I was aware of the fact that the instant taxi was stolen.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to acquire stolen goods.

2. Defendant C is a taxi engineer operating H taxi. On July 18, 2014, around 00:30 on July 18, 2014, Defendant C acquired one of the 700,000 won Samsung Gggal lusium 3 smartphones at the market price offered by the victim I located in the lower seat of the apartment located in the apartment located in the apartment located in the vicinity of the apartment.

The Defendant, without taking necessary procedures such as returning the acquired property to the victim, embezzled the property he/she had on his/her own mind.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 362(1) and Article 30(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fines) Defendant C: Article 360 of the Criminal Act.

arrow