beta
Text
Defendant
A, B, and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A and Defendant D’s co-principal intent to engage in credit business at the same time on November 2009, and Defendant A determined whether to grant loans and provided funds. Defendant D had mutual intent to receive KRW 1200,000 per month and receive KRW 120,000 per month and engage in the distribution and collection of leaflets.
The Defendants loaned KRW 1.9 million to J (in the amount of KRW 2 million, the deduction of KRW 1.00,000,000 per day from KRW 60 days to KRW 40,000,000) at a place where it is impossible to identify the address of the original city and around June 8, 2010, and received interest of KRW 21,075,000 from KRW 225.69% to KRW 292.12% per year from June 10, 2010 as shown in attached Table 1.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to engage in credit business and received interest in excess of the interest rate under the Interest Limitation Act.
2. On December 2010, Defendants B, C, and D, with intent to engage in credit business as well as Defendant B, and Defendant C, with intent to engage in the business, divided into one another’s original share certificates, and Defendant C, with intent to engage in the business and divide the profits therefrom into half. Defendant D, with intent to receive KRW 1300,000 per month and receive the benefits of KRW 130,000 per month, with mutual order.
around December 3, 2010, the Defendants loaned KRW 1 million to K at a place where the address of the prime city or below is unknown, and received interest of KRW 225.69% per annum from that time to January 4, 2012, from that time, from that time, the Defendants received KRW 20,000 per annum under the name of interest and principal for 60 days, and received interest of KRW 225.69% per annum from that time. From January 4, 2012, the Defendants loaned KRW 8,5750,00 to that of the above K, etc. over 49 times as shown in the separate crime list 2.69%.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to engage in credit business and received interest in excess of the limited interest rate under the Interest Limitation Act.
3. Defendant C and Defendant D’s co-principal defendants are as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (2).