A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B (the age of 42) are married couple.

At around 16:10 on May 26, 2020, the Defendant used a hacker (34cm in length) that is dangerous for the victim's left part of the victim's left part of the hacker (34cm in length) once, three times on the part of the victim's left part of the hacker, while the victim hacks the part of the victim's hacker's hacker's hacks over the floor, walked the part of the hacker's hacker's hacker's hacks in two sides, and hacks the hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacks over the floor, and hacks the victim's head of the hacker's hacker's hack.

The Defendant continued to use a knife (7.5cm in knife length, 29cm in total) which is a dangerous thing in another nife, and knife one time in knife, and knife the knife of the victim's head, and the victim knife in the vehicle parked adjacent to the nife.e., the Defendant opened a driver's seat and knife five times in knife of the victim's face and head.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous articles with the victim for about 2 weeks, brought about the following arms in need of treatment and the strawing of the detailed parts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police concerning B's legal statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspended sentence is that the criminal defendant committed an injury against his/her spouse by breaking violence, and in light of the method and degree of exercising tools and tangible force used for the crime, the crime is considerably poor.

However, the defendant seems to have been aware of his/her mistake and against himself/herself, and the defendant has been transferred to a family child protection case several times, but there is no criminal charge, and the victim has agreed with the defendant.