logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.06.26 2013고단1089
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

2,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. At around 20:00, on September 201, the Defendant purchased 20,000 philophones from the Dcafeteria located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, after requesting psychotropic drugs to seek psychotropic drugs from E, and 2,00,000 won from E, and purchasing philophones 2.7 gh from E, containing three psychotropic drugs.

2. Medication of phiphones.

A. At around 21:00 on the same day as Paragraph 1, the Defendant 21:00, in the residence of Gangnam-gu Seoul Ftel 1916 G, divided 0.05 g of the philopon purchased as above into three in a single-use injection instrument, and dilutiond the aquatic water as soon as possible, and then administered it in a way that the Defendant, G, and H injections into his own arms.

B. At around 12:00 the following day, the Defendant, at the residence of the above G, 12:00, divelopon 0.05 glopon copon 0.05 gopon copon copon crison crison crison crison crison crison crison, and administered crison c

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E, I, G, and H;

1. Article 60 (1) 3 and Article 4 (1) and Article 2 subparagraph 4 (b) (the purchase of phiphones and the provision of each medication) of the former Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (Amended by Act No. 10786, Jun. 7, 201) concerning criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. has not been subject to criminal punishment since 2003, and all of the crimes of this case are divided. However, since the defendant has been punished twice for the same kind of crime, and he purchased a large quantity of phiphones and administered them with other persons, it is inevitable to sentence sentence.

arrow