1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 13,391,567 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 10,761,044 to Plaintiff B; and (c) respectively, from April 29, 2017 to February 2018.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 29, 2017, around 09:50, there was an accident in which the malfunction of the network E-operation (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff Oba”) was shocked by the malfunction of the network drive (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff Oba”), which was directly driven at the intersection in which the U.S. drive D (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) was located, which had not been sent to the left at the intersection, 704-dong, Ulsan-gun, U.S.-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S. (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

B. While the Deceased was hospitalized by suffering bodily injury, such as the mouth of the catherum, etc. due to the instant accident, he/she died on June 11, 2017 due to catum death.

C. The Plaintiff A’s wife, the Plaintiff B’s children, and the Defendant is an insurance company that entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1, video of Eul evidence 1, purport of whole pleadings

2. The Road Traffic Act provides that “the driver of any motor vehicle who intends to drive a motor vehicle into the intersection where traffic is not controlled shall yield the course to other motor vehicles when other motor vehicles are already traveling through the intersection (Article 26(1)); the driver of any motor vehicle who intends to drive a motor vehicle to the left at the intersection shall yield the course to other motor vehicles when other motor vehicles are going to drive straight or turn to the right at the intersection (Article 26(4)); and the driver of any motor vehicle shall temporarily stop or yield the course to other motor vehicles when other motor vehicles are going to drive a motor vehicle to the intersection where the traffic is not controlled and safety signs indicating the temporary suspension or concession are installed (Article 25(6)).”

According to the video of Eul evidence No. 1, although the defendant's vehicle entered the intersection where no signal, etc. is available, it immediately stopped in order to take into account the progress of other vehicles, and it was found that the plaintiff's Otoba left the intersection.

Then, Defendant .