A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On March 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment by a general military court of the 55 Army common military courts at the Army on March 10, 201, and was released on December 31, 2014, and the term of imprisonment has expired on January 21, 2015.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported the Defendant’s posting of the Defendant’s posted to and contacted the Defendant’s online trading website with the content of selling Vave Pave Pave Pave Paves and the instant post to “to send things upon deposit of money.”

However, because the defendant did not have the above saves and saves, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the money to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received a total of KRW 370,000 from the injured party to the one bank account in the name of the Defendant, on two occasions.

2. The Defendant, on March 1, 2017, put together with the Internet Nenebber Kafe in the Central and High Republic of Korea.

A false statement was made to the victim D who reported and contacted the Defendant’s notice posted by the Defendant stating that he/she will sell a new letter, stating that he/she will send the goods upon deposit of money.

However, because the defendant did not have the above faith, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the money to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 1,275,000 won from the injured party to the single bank account under the name of the Defendant.

3. On March 3, 2017, the Defendant’s hubd on Internet NAVER “E” (E) around March 3, 2017.

The victim F's notice stating the purchase of a new letter shall be reported, and the victim shall contact the victim with the victim to deposit the money.

A false statement was made that “to send a new letter.”

However, because the defendant did not have the above faith, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the money to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant is suffering from the damage.