Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:40 on March 27, 2013, the Defendant operated B concrete mixtures trucks in the direction of the same Dong-dong in the direction of the common-dong, the common-dong, 875-gil-dong, Ansan-dong.

Although a person who drives a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent an accident by safely operating the front section, the driver of the motor vehicle, and safely operating the steering gear, the defendant did not discover the Datoba, which was operated by the victim C (year 72) who was in the front of the truck driving direction before the truck driving direction, and caused the victim to die by cerebrovassis, etc. at the scene of the accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A practical survey report, an accident-related photograph, a body of autopsy, a certified copy of the body, and a photograph of a changeer;

1. Application of statutes to inquiries about criminal records, etc.;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1)(Article 62(1)(Article 62(1)(Article 62(1)), although there are circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the nature and result of the crime in light of the method and consequence, etc. of the crime in this case, there is no previous offense against the defendant, and the vehicle driven by the defendant at the time of the traffic accident in this case was covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and there was agreement with the victim. The defendant has a depth of his mistake, his social relationship is obvious, and the detention of the defendant entails excessive difficulty for his family members, and

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;