logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.17 2016누47620
공무상요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition of the following contents. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, "Evidence" in the fifth fifth third of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added to "the testimony of a witness of the trial and D".

After the fifth fifth 10th of the judgment of the first instance court, the phrase “one of the players of the B Team to which the Plaintiff belongs did not participate in the instant practice competition)” was added to “The next day of the instant practice competition, not immediately existed after the instant practice competition, and the participation in the practice of this case was not forced.”

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow