logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.06.04 2014고정2010
위증
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 26, 2013, around 15:00, Defendant AY appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s case of violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) against Sungnam Branch of Suwon District Court No. 3, 2013 Man-Ma808, and took an oath.

In the above court, the Defendant testified that, at around 23:00 on August 29, 2012, BA driven a motor vehicle without a driver’s license, BA had been aware of the fact that BA driven a motor vehicle without a driver’s license on the roads before Sungnam-si, Manam-si.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. At around September 11, 2013, Defendant A appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s case of violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) against the 2013 Man-Ma808, the Suwon District Court’s Sungnam Branch No. 3, 2013, and took an oath.

In the above court, the Defendant testified that, at around 23:00 on August 29, 2012, BA driven a motor vehicle without a driver’s license, BA had been aware of the fact that BA driven a motor vehicle without a driver’s license on the roads before Sungnam-si, Manam-si.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness BD, BE, and BF;

1. Statement made by the witness BF in the fourth trial records of this Court 2013 Highest 808 case;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. According to each evidence of the judgment (which does not appear to have any circumstance to suspect the credibility of each statement made by BD, BE and BF, and the fact that BA's driving of the instant vehicle without a license around August 29, 2012 became final and conclusive at around 23:00 on August 29, 2012, the fact that the Defendants testified in a false manner as stated in the facts charged can be sufficiently recognized).

1. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 152 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. The Criminal Code of the Detention of Labor House; and

arrow