The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant reflects his mistake, and that the defendant has no record of punishment heavier than that of suspended sentence is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the following is disadvantageous.

At the new wall time, the upper limit is driving at a speed exceeding 30 km/h of 30 km, even though the upper limit is sufficiently reduced and the front door is well considered, and the Defendant was driving at a speed exceeding 30 km.

The crime of this case resulted in a result that could not be complied with due to the death of the victim.

The victim's bereaved family members did not receive any compensation because the defendant did not purchase a mandatory motor vehicle insurance policy.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances following the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, even if considering the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.