Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of a C truck.

On March 19, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on March 19, 2016, and proceeded at a speed of 2 lanes 121.8 km from the parallel of inland highways in the Si/Gu-U.S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S. Si-S.

At the time, it was still difficult to keep the surroundings around the road because it was closed, and in such a case, it has a duty of care to secure a sufficient safety distance with the vehicle in front of the operation of the vehicle and to operate the steering and steering system safely by accurately manipulating the traffic situation in front of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to secure the safety distance with the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the

After all, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the above occupational negligence by damaging two parts of evidence in the workplace.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to dead bodies;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. All kinds of reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant led to the instant crime; (b) the Defendant agreed with the victim at the investigation stage; (c) the victim did not want the Defendant’s punishment; (d) the Defendant’s vehicle is admitted to the nationwide cargo trucking mutual aid association; and (e) it appears that the victim’s vehicle would have been able to recover from damage on the part of the victim; and