beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Defendant A] 2016 Highest 3493
1. On July 2014, the Defendant, at the office of the F Co., Ltd. operated by the victim E in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, newly constructs 20 or more multi-family houses with the victim “G from Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si and I to the forest and fields located therein,” and in fact, the Defendant has the right to execute the said construction as a representative of G, thereby allowing F to perform steel reinforced concrete construction works.
At present, there is a shortage of money to be used as expenses related to the construction permit, design cost, start-up system, etc., and the loan will provide F with steel reinforced concrete construction and pay the money within one month of the loan.
“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, the defendant was not a representative of G Co., Ltd., and was a director of the company
If the J lends KRW 25 million to the J, the said J did not have the ability to subcontract the said steel reinforced concrete construction to the victim with the intent to find out a permit for construction of the said multi-family house from Asan City and to modify the terms of the contract so that the Defendant can execute the construction with the consent of the owner of the building. At the time, the Defendant was only liable for a debt of at least 50 million won without any particular property or income, and the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the victim the money within one month.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and transferred the victim to the corporate bank account of the defendant as to August 6, 2014, KRW 30 million, and KRW 10 million on August 7, 2014.
2. On August 19, 2015, the Defendant would immediately repay money to the said victim by calls from the said victim to the needy land (hereinafter referred to as Suwon-si).
“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the damages even if he borrowed the money from the damaged person, such as the statement in paragraph 1.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and is the corporate bank of the defendant under the pretext of borrowing from the victim.