logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.12.21 2016나2017031
소유권이전등기절차이행등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court of the first instance should explain are as follows. Thus, the reasoning of the court of the first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment, except for the following cases, and it is citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

In light of the following facts and circumstances, “However, it is difficult to believe that each statement No. 13 and No. 29 is merely a factual confirmation and statement of the former representative director of the Plaintiff, and considering that Eul’s statement No. 1 and No. 29 can show the overall purport of pleadings,” the following facts and circumstances, “However, it is difficult to easily believe that Eul’s testimony of evidence No. 13, 27, 29, and 31 as well as witness L of the court of first instance may not be seen, and considering the following facts and circumstances, Eul’s testimony of evidence No. 23-3, and evidence No. 24-6 of the judgment No. 1 and evidence No. 5 of the judgment “No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance is changed with the signature and seal No. 5 of the court of first instance,” and the signature and seal No. 5 of the court of first instance cannot be changed with the signature and seal No. 3 and the seal No. 5 of the court of first instance, “No. 7 of the court of first instance.

further, A.

arrow