logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.01.25 2016나2061939
부당이득금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court of the first instance should explain are as follows. Thus, the reasoning of the court of the first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment, except for the following cases, and it is citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the first instance court’s 4th 10th e.g., “the amount of investment or capital investment.” From 5th 3th e.g., the first instance court’s e., 5th e., 1, 2, and 4th e.g., “the amount of investment”. In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the entire purport of the witness W’s testimony and pleading, the Defendant cannot be deemed to be an investor who contributed to the instant business.” The Defendant cannot be deemed to be an investor who contributed to the instant business. The Defendant’s written evidence Nos. 9-1, 2, and 4 of the evidence No. 9-2, and the witness W of the first instance court’s e.g., the witness’s testimony (excluding the subsequent part that is not trusted by the Defendant) and the entire purport of oral argument, it is difficult to easily believe that some of the witness testimony of the first instance court’s e., Party 8, 12, or 15th e., was dismissed.

arrow