1. The defendant confirms that each land listed in the separate sheet is owned by the plaintiff.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. In the Forest Survey Division prepared in the Japanese colonial era, the Gyeonggi-do Forest Survey Division 20 YYY 8 (hereinafter “instant land before the instant partition”) is written that D residing in Ri was under the circumstances.

B. The cadastral record on the above real estate was destroyed due to the Korean War, and thereafter, the parcel number and the cadastral record were restored, and thereafter, on September 25, 1974, each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each land of this case”) was registered following the division and the registration conversion. The defendant completed the registration preservation registration under each defendant’s name on March 12, 1996, for each land listed in paragraph (1) of the separate sheet, following the public notice of non-real estate under the State Property Act, in which each land of this case was unregistered.

C. The deceased and the deceased deceased and the deceased deceased and the deceased deceased and the deceased deceased and the deceased deceased on March 20, 193, the head of the family MH, the heir of the family, succeeded to the sole inheritance.

G’s children, other than the above H, I, J, K, L, and E. H had wife M, children among them, N,O, and P. However, the remaining persons other than E, were missing due to the 6.25 incident, and the judgment of disappearance was finalized by Suwon District Court Decision 2004Ra141, which became final and conclusive, and only E remains the inheritor.

E brought a lawsuit against the Defendant to cancel registration of preservation of ownership in the name of the Defendant for each of the instant lands on the ground that he/she is the deceased F’s heir. However, the Defendant appealed against the Defendant on the ground that the Suwon District Court Decision 2006No. 2006Na4240 decided on the ground that the Defendant did not have any evidence of the same person, namely, E’s name and E’s name, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 9, 2007, with Supreme Court Decision 2006Da81509 Decided February 9, 2007.

(hereinafter “Lawsuit prior to the instant case”). E.

The network E died on December 29, 2007, and the heir of Q, R, S, T, and the plaintiff's property is the deceased's property.