A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 614"

1. On October 9, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) with the support of the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-cheon, and on November 25, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime at least twice.

On March 12, 2017, at around 11:15, the Defendant driven a B-ho car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.113% without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of the Simn-si, such as the Gum-si Master’s Master’s Name, to the front side of the Simn-si, the Simn-si, the three-way master’s name, to the front side of the Simn-si, the Gum-si, and the front side of the Gum-si apartment.

2. The Defendant, at the time of the day specified in paragraph 1, was under control when driving the center line in front of the above two mountain apartment complexes, while driving at the center, and was under control. The Defendant: (a) had the mind of having been requested by the policeman D to present a driver’s license; (b) had the police officer, who was in charge of obtaining a driver’s license; and (c) had the police officer, informed D of the name and the above resident registration number of E; (d) had the policeman informed D of the name and the above resident registration number; and (e) had the policeman drafted a notice file of penalty payment notification and the results of regulating drinking by accessing the transportation police computer network using PDA; and (e) signed the electronic document as “E” in the electronic record.

As a result, for the purpose of handling administrative affairs, the defendant has forged a notice of penalty payment, which is a special media record such as electronic records of public officials or public offices, and a notice file as a result of regulating drinking driving.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, displayed a notice of payment of a penalty, and a file of notification of the result of the crackdown on drinking driving, as seen above, to a policeman D, who was aware of the fact that the electronic records, etc. were sent to him/her via a traffic police computer network, thereby exercising the same.

4. The Defendant shall forge a private document.