logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.07.07 2015가합56309
부당이득금
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant entered into an insurance contract with the Plaintiff as the insured and entered into an insurance contract on April 6, 2009 (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with the Plaintiff as the Defendant.

B. After the Defendant’s instant insurance contract was concluded, the Defendant received hospitalized treatment for 22 days from August 3, 2009 to August 24, 2009 as “slurg, surgical, surgical, and surgical,” and received from August 3, 2009 to November 19, 2014 for 464 days.

C. The status of the conclusion of each insurance contract with the defendant as the insured and the contents of each insurance contract of this case maintained at the time of the conclusion of the insurance contract of this case or concluded after the insurance contract of this case, and the insurance proceeds received from the insurance companies including the plaintiff under the above insurance contracts are as follows:

An insurance company’s subscription date for monthly insurance premium 1-year fran fol fol fol fol fol fol fol fol 137,33 won on March 23, 2006, KRW 52,173,750 won on August 5, 2008, KRW 50, KRW 19,500 won on August 5, 2008, KRW 19,950,853 won on March 26, 2008, KRW 158,280, KRW 40,349,072 won on December 6, 2009, KRW 206,606, KRW 608, KRW 6284, KRW 6285, KRW 6385,2885 won on December 26, 2005,

라. 피고의 소득 피고가 2007년부터 2013년 사이에 세무서에 신고한ㅎ 소득금액은 아래 표와 같다.

The global income (unit of won) for the year 2013 5,171,136 2012 4,665,471 201 4,38,577 2011 4,388,577 2010 3,949,408 2009 3,2222,831 209, 209,610 207 1,978,650 / 2007 / without dispute, Gap evidence of 1 through 4, Eul evidence of 3 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of this court's response to each order to submit financial transaction information to the interesting life insurance company, interesting and fire marine insurance company, and the result of this court's response to the National Health Insurance Corporation.

arrow