logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.27 2017나15590
양수금
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. As to KRW 1,886,91 and KRW 1,405,00 among the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s KRW 1,405,00, May 16, 2017.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. Basic facts (1) The Defendant received a loan as follows, but did not pay the loan.

On November 14, 106, the interest and overdue interest rate of the date lending institution (won) were 1,500,000 annual 39% (2) of the loan to the defendant as follows. Each transferee was delegated by the transferor to notify the defendant of the transfer of the transfer, and each transferee notified the defendant of the transfer of the transfer.

On December 29, 12, 14, 23, 204, 14, 23, 23, 14, 23, 14, 14, 23, 14, 23, 14, 23, 14, 23, 14, 23, 14, 23, 14, 23, 23, 14, 23, 3, of the notification date of the transfer of the claim by the transferor, which is the assignee of the transfer of the claim by transfer, to

On the 1, 17.15.15.1,405,003,231,598 4,636,598 / [Grounds for recognition] The respective descriptions of Gap evidence 1 through 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum with respect to the Plaintiff’s principal amount of KRW 1,886,91 (i.e., principal amount of KRW 1,405,00 and KRW 481,91) and the principal amount of KRW 1,405,00 from May 16, 2017 to the date of full payment, which is the day following the date of final settlement of interest.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim is accepted for the reasons, and the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair for the conclusion, and it is so revoked, and it is so decided as per Disposition by ordering the defendant to pay it.

arrow