The judgment below

The part against the Defendant is reversed, and that part of the case is remanded to the Seoul High Court.

The plaintiffs.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to the Defendant’s ground of appeal

A. The lower court determined that: (a) around January 6, 2009, the Defendant conspired to establish a curriculum special committee under the jurisdiction of the National Council of Education and Technology for the purpose of establishing the concept of future-type curriculum and developing the basic direction; (b) subsequent reorganization procedures were conducted; (c) the textbooks of the first-year common subject at the fifth session of the curriculum special committee held around May 14, 2009 were already developed; (d) there was a need to prepare a way to use the textbooks for a certain period of time (e.g., five years) under the “207 revised curriculum”; (c) the Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science as part of the implementation of the curriculum revision in 209, which concluded a new curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related study-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related curriculum-related development.

In addition, the lower court determined that the Plaintiffs were high schools.