1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the funds ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 30, 2008, the Minister of Education, Science and Technology announced that the examination of the authorization books developed under Article 2007-79 ( February 28, 2007) of the 2010 of the 2010 Public Notice of the Amended Curriculum (hereinafter “the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology”) was conducted as follows (hereinafter “Public Notice of the 2010 Authorization”) by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology No. 2008-144.

1. Subjects subject to authorization: Class 19 of a class 52-Class 2 high school curriculum: Science in the year of application of the year of authorization for the year of authorization for the development of the year of authorization for the names of essential subjects and the class 1 of a class 1 of a class of a class of curriculum among the general basic subjects or specialized subjects;

3. The period of application and the period of application for examination of places: November 2, 2009 to November 6 (gold).

8. The term of validity of the authorization for the curriculum books subject to the examination of relics shall be five years from the school year in which the relevant curriculum books are first used;

(b) The term of validity of the textbook that has passed the additional authorization shall be the remaining term of validity of the curriculum books for the same subject; and in addition, when any cause for reorganization, such as full-scale or partial revision of the curriculum, such term of validity,

(b) spring.

Accordingly, the plaintiffs produced test copies of high school scientific textbooks for the examination of authorization in 2010.

C. After the publication of the instant authorization, the structure of the curriculum books for elementary and secondary schools, including the first-year curriculum of high school, was reorganized as prescribed in Article 2010-1 (hereinafter “instant notification”) of the notification of the curriculum books, and the method of adopting the curriculum books for high school was changed from the national policy and authorization system to the recognition system.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiffs asserted 1 prepared an application for authorization of a high school science textbook with each development cost stated in the purport of the claim until October 31, 2009 according to the publication of this case by the Minister of Education, Science and Technology, which announced the high school science textbook as the textbook subject to authorization.

However, the defendant himself.