logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.12.09 2019나7905
공사대금
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

2. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 39.45 million and Defendant E.

Reasons

Basic Facts

Defendant E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant E”) contracted the instant new construction work to Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) as the owner and implementer of the instant new construction of the main complex building (hereinafter “instant building”) located in F at the time of residence (hereinafter “instant new construction”).

Exclusionary Construction Works and Specifications

1. Installation of pipes from the building;

2. The indoor bathing room works are used for PVVV2.

3. For the off-import market, the market is used for PVE VG2.

4. In cases of a ceiling pipe for the first floor, the pipes using low-noise pipes;

5. Two rooms and toilets for the first floor, commercial buildings, and pipelines for the second floor;

6. Execution with a width of not less than 80m/m shall be adjacent to m. 80m/m;

7. Payment and construction of closure facilities from the outer wall of a building shall be conducted in the construction thereof;

On February 24, 2017, Defendant B entered into a subcontract (hereinafter “instant subcontract”) with the Plaintiff operating an individual entrepreneur under the trade name of “G”) regarding sanitary facility works among the new construction works of this case (hereinafter “instant construction works”) with respect to the construction cost of KRW 17,3250,00 and the construction period from February 24, 2017 to September 30, 2017 (hereinafter “instant subcontract”). The instant subcontract is accompanied by the following terms and conditions.

The name of construction: 110EA x 20,00 x 20,00 x 8EA 150,000 x 12 x 8,440,000 x 12 x 12 x 8,440,210 x the Plaintiff’s additional construction specifications (Evidence A; hereinafter “the instant additional construction specifications”) as follows on August 11, 2017. Defendant B’s On-site Director written at the bottom of the instant additional construction specifications stating “A 7,800,000 x 12 x8,000 x x 15 x

The Plaintiff completed the instant construction work on or around December 10, 2017, and on May 2017, Defendant B as the construction cost of the instant case.

arrow