1. The Defendant’s KRW 74,893,766 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from June 21, 2016 to August 21, 2018.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and announcement 1) Project name: Kim Sea B general industrial complex development project (hereinafter “instant project”);

(2) Notice: C Public Notice of Kimhae-si on July 29, 2010, D Public Notice of Kimhae-si on December 2, 2010, D Public Notice of Kimhae-si on September 27, 2012, E Public Notice of Kimhae-si on October 17, 2013, G Public Notice of Kimhae-si on November 21, 2013, and H 3 project operator of Kimhae-si on January 14, 2016: Defendant:

B. Objects to be expropriated by the Gyeongnam-do Regional Land Expropriation Committee on April 26, 2016: The real estate indicated in paragraph (1) of the attached Table (hereinafter “instant real estate”) shall be the real estate indicated in paragraph (1) of the attached Table

(2) Each of the articles listed in paragraphs (2) and (2) of the same list (hereinafter “instant articles”).

(2) Compensation for losses: 1,003,381,250 won in total (i.e., the instant real estate 99,498,750 won) (i.e., the instant real estate 3,882,50 won): An appraisal corporation on June 20, 201 and a uniform appraisal corporation;

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s objection No. 1 on December 22, 2016: A total of KRW 1,045,046,400 (i.e., the instant real estate 1,041,163,900) (i.e., the instant real estate 3,882,500) 2) An appraisal corporation: Sam Chang Chang Corporation and a State appraisal corporation (hereinafter the instant appraiser collectively referred to as “adjudication appraiser”; and (ii) the result of the appraisal is referred to as “adjudication appraisal”).

(d) As a result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal, 1,19,940,166 won in total [1,078,464,30 won of the instant real estate (11 pages) 1,078,464,30 won of the instant real estate] 2] Expert appraiser: B/C Corporation 1,475,866 won of the instant real estate (36 pages 26, 2018: hereinafter collectively referred to as “court appraiser”; hereinafter referred to as “court appraisal result”) / The fact that there is no dispute over the results of appraisal, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Eul evidence 1,2 (including number number; hereinafter the same shall apply), appraisal corporation and I’s reply to the commission, and the purport of the whole appraisal and pleading as a whole.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion.