Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who was the occupant of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, and was from March 11, 2013 to February 20 of the same month, was the head of the said apartment-based autonomous council from March 1, 2013, and had conducted a special audit on the victim D, who was the head of the said apartment-based autonomous council, and had been dissatisfied with the victim D and E, who was dissatisfied with the management office of the said apartment-based management office, attempted to terminate the audit and to impair the honor of the victims by distributing defective printed materials.

1. From April 13, 2013 to the 14th day of the same month, the Defendant: (a) under the title, “The auditor elected by C apartment in 2013 as the auditor of C apartment; and (b) under the title, “The auditor A. who was elected by the auditor of C apartment in 2013.”, the Defendant paid in lieu of the delinquent taxes by the head of Ulsan-gu, the residents

The former president D cancelled the public auction with a large number of residents in arrears, thereby leaving 10,115,440 won.

In order to verify the authenticity of the collection amount for each item of management expenses, gas expenses, and the actual collection amount for each unit of household, it is impossible to confirm each unit of household by refusing to submit a list of occupants of apartment houses even if the request is made to verify the authenticity of the collection amount for each item of management expenses, gas expenses, and the actual collection amount for each unit of household.

It is not a comparison of the amount to be collected, and thus we see that it may be possible to do so.

"............. (4) The accounting that we have employed as blood is not known prior to October 2010.

If the submission of data is requested, it has partially overlap through the back page duplication, has intentionally concealed the provision of information, and delayed the audit time due to printed materials.

The apartment complex was distributed to the residents of the 192 household in the above apartment complex with three printed materials of the A4 site stating the contents of "the apartment complex".

However, it is true that the access road to apartment was in the process of the public auction due to the local tax delinquency.