All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. In light of the details of this part of the crime and the records of the Defendant’s past sexual crime, it is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant had the intent to commit rape at the time of the crime in this part.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of this part of the facts charged is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the intention of rape.

2. Determination

A. 1) In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the prosecutor, the lower court’s determination on the ground that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone proves that the Defendant had the intent to rape at the time of the crime in this part was proven without reasonable doubt.

On the ground that it is difficult to see this part of the facts charged, the lower court acquitted.

(1) A victim has prevented the defendant from suffering as his/her hand after taking the victim back and her head with a pipe.

The victim saw that the victim was able to return the victim's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's k

“The statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

The victim made a statement to the effect that he was able to sexually assault the victim in light of the fact that the defendant assaulted the victim and tried to attract him to a mountain without lighting at night, but this is the direction of the victim.