1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 13, 2014, when the Plaintiff’s husband worked in Insan-si E located in Ansan-si, the Plaintiff’s husband (hereinafter referred to as “the Plaintiff’s husband”) was involved in the accident of cleaning the crowdfunding and entering the roller’s hand (hereinafter “the instant accident”), and obtained the Defendant’s medical care from the Defendant’s disease (hereinafter referred to as “the instant disease”) by suffering from serious stimulating pressure damage to the part of the front part of the right part, the stimulating pressure damage to the right part, the stimulating pressure damage to the upper part of the front part, the right part, and the stimulating damage to the upper part, the upper part of the front part, the front part inside the right part, the front part and the stimulating part, the right part, the upper part, the second part, the right part, the upper part, the upper part, and the part of the river mouth and the part of the river mouth in the upper part.

B. After the occurrence of the instant accident, the Deceased received medical care at the F Hospital located in Ansan-si and the G Hospital located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. On October 4, 2014, after installing a tent wooden pole in the warehouse of G Hospital, the Deceased committed suicide.

C. The Plaintiff claimed for the payment of bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant, but on January 21, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition rejecting the payment on the ground that “the deceased’s suicide is not recognized as an occupational accident, since there is no medical basis to deem that there was no mental diagnosis and treatment related to the instant disaster or injury, and there was no other mental disorder.”

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

The Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Defendant on the instant disposition, but the request for review was dismissed on April 20, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 5, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

(a) as shown in the Attachment of the relevant statutes;

B. 1) On March 14, 2014, the Deceased’s medical care and treatment details are as follows.