beta
Title
(ps) Sale to his/her dependent in excess of his/her liability shall constitute a fraudulent act.
Summary
(C) The sales contract of this case constitutes a fraudulent act in relation to tax authorities, and thus, should be revoked. The sales contract of this case constitutes a fraudulent act in relation to tax authorities.
Cases
2012Da42796 Revocation of Fraudulent Act
Plaintiff-Appellee
Korea
Defendant-Appellant
KimA
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by