beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Since around 2012, the Defendant had operated the “C” in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do. However, since around 2012, there was no multi-business performance, and there was no normal operation since 2014, and there was a accumulated debt amounting to KRW 60,000 from the neighboring people and bond business operators in order to prepare for insufficient multi-family business expenses and living expenses, etc., and there was a lack of economic situation, such as borrowing money from the neighboring people and bond business operators, and there was no other property or income, so even if there was no intention or ability to repay the money from the victim D.
1. The Defendant, on August 28, 2015, at “F cafeteria” located in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, would dispose of the part of the part of the Defendant who lent money to the victim D and repaid the money with the deposit.
“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, in fact, the Defendant did not pay monthly rent to the lessor of the building at the time and did not have any intent or ability to pay in full, even if he borrowed money from the victim due to the above circumstances.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim and receiving KRW 2,70,000 from the victim in cash on the same day, and obtained the total amount of KRW 8,650,000 through six times from around that time to November 20, 2015 as stated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and acquired it by deceiving the victim under the name of borrowed money.
2. The Defendant: (a) on March 27, 2017, at the influorial area of the Yecheon-gun, Gecheon-gun, Gecheon-gun, Gecheon-gun, the Defendant requires the Defendant to pay a fluor
It shall be paid KRW 100,000 per day with profits from the business of lending money.
“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, the defendant at the time of damage.