logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.05.12 2015가합207727
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from August 13, 2015 to May 12, 2016.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is unmarried female, and the defendant is a spouse who has completed the marriage report with C on July 31, 2009, and the plaintiff and the defendant became aware of the company's partnership fees.

B. From February 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant provided inappropriate teaching services, such as exchanging messages using Kakakao Stockholm, with a private meta, on several occasions, and had sexual intercourse.

C. On June 30, 2014, at around 01:00 and July 2, 201:00 on June 30, 2014, the Defendant, at the Plaintiff’s home, taken pictures of the Plaintiff’s chests and the parts of the Plaintiff’s chests using the Plaintiff’s smartphone camera function that the Plaintiff was under the influence of alcohol.

During that process, the Plaintiff was aware of the fact that the Plaintiff caused inappropriate interference with the Defendant’s wife C. On July 4, 2014, the Plaintiff drafted a letter to the Defendant’s wife C, stating, “I would pay 10 million won to the victim C until July 7, 2014, and would not receive the phone from B (Defendant) again after July 4, 2014. In this case, I would pay 50 million won as consolation money.” Accordingly, the Plaintiff remitted 10 million won to C on July 7, 2014.

E. However, the Plaintiff and the Defendant were subsequent to July 14, 2014.

7. 15. Also, the message was given using the Kakao Stockholm, etc. with a private kylnam.

F. At around 01:00 on July 16, 2014, the Defendant taken a film of the Plaintiff’s chests and the part side by using a smartphone camera function that the Defendant was under influence of alcohol, and taken against the Plaintiff’s will.

G. Around that time, C was aware that the Plaintiff, who was taken and kept in custody by the Defendant, was able to look at the above video, and that the Plaintiff was continuously negligent with the Defendant.

H. C On August 4, 2014, at the Seogu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court, it is against the Plaintiff on the ground of an unlawful act.

arrow