logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.11.17 2015구합7104
징계면직처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

The party status intervenor in the process of the instant disciplinary action was established on November 26, 1959 and engaged in banking business by employing 8,800 full-time workers. The Plaintiff is a person who joined the Intervenor on August 4, 1980 and worked as a branch office B from July 21, 201.

On October 24, 2014, the instant disciplinary intervenor against the Plaintiff was subject to disciplinary action following the resolution of the disciplinary committee, and the Plaintiff was subject to disciplinary action as follows.

(hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”). 【Grounds for Disciplinary Action】

1. From July 21, 201, 201, 139 items, 4.6 million won was introduced from non-qualified loan applicants C, and 69 items among them, 1.748 billion won was treated as unfair credit, and 72 items as of September 11, 2014; 1.8 billion won was overdue (38% per annum) was occurred as of September 11, 201; and 1.8 billion won was likely to occur in the future; and 3.8% was conducted to attract customers.

2. A violation of the prohibition of division and nominal credit shall be treated as KRW 190 million for a company-general loan of KRW 190 million to D and four businesses, the real manager of which is divided and transferred in name.

3. To lend KRW 74,50,000 to C, which is a customer who violates the prohibition of private lending and lending of money, on eight occasions and to borrow KRW 21,70,000 on two occasions and to engage in private lending and lending transactions;

4. Non-fiters in dealing with credit.

(a) 21 cases of unfair handling of new desired weather loan and failure to verify the status of income documents, 8 cases of inconsistency between the payment statement and the amount of transfer of benefits account, 12 cases of failure to verify the details of transfer of benefits for at least three months in the benefit account, and 43 cases of failure to verify the details of transfer of benefits for at least three months, including 2 cases of omission in the draft of the payment statement, and 780 million won in a new desired weather loan;

(b) improperly handle the SS lending of 16 cases in total, 387 million won in total, and 387 million won in terms of the authenticity of employment and income documents for SS lending.

(c) An unfair handling of mortgage loans, a credit guarantee consignment issuance certificate, and a credit guarantee certificate, and a total of five confirmations on the authenticity of income documents, 390,000 won, shall be issued on consignment of a credit guarantee.

arrow