A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for special injury in the Seo-gu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on May 8, 2017.

1. On June 4, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) the police officer affiliated with the police box C of the police station, which was called out after receiving a report that “the taxi guest gets off a fare and frighting,” in the body of a long-term franch located in 49, Seogu Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant: (b) paid the taxi fee to the Defendant; (c) the police officer of the police box C of the police station, who was called out, paid the taxi fee to the Defendant; and (d)

“In doing so, the police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of public peace and order by assaulting, such as at least once selling the sound part of the above D with his hand.”

2. On June 4, 2017, the Defendant damaged goods for public use by avoiding disturbance, i.e., e., assaulting in the office for criminal watch keeping service at the police station in the Taegu-gu Police Station in 259-gil 15, 259, as of the Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, and thereby damaging goods used by public offices, i.e., e., a one-way winding at the market price of KRW 54,00,000, which was adjacent to the atmosphere of the police station at the place where she listens to the end of the police station’s phrase “at a more stringer,” and a one-way winding around the atmosphere at the end of the atmosphere.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. The 112 reported case processing slips, work log receipts, taxi fares receipts, damaged goods and sales-value photographs, CCTV images-cape photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (report on confirmation of repeated crimes) statute;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136(1) (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and 141(1) (the point of damaging goods for public use) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes

1. The Defendant alleged that he did not assault a police officer as stated in the judgment, but is the police officer.