logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.12.17 2014노1355
전자금융거래법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is a favorable condition for the defendant, for the following reasons: (a) the defendant, as a recipient of basic living expenses, led to confession and reflecting the crime of this case; and (b) the defendant has no record of punishment for

However, considering the reality that the so-called large passbook is massed by the transfer of the means of electronic financial transactions as to the crime of this case, and such large passbook is abused for various crimes, it is difficult to deem that the defendant's actual crime quality is not weak; that the passbook transferred by the defendant was used for financial fraud crimes; that the defendant could have been used for the crime of this case; and that the passbook transferred by the defendant could not be used for the crime of this case was not predicted at all; and in full view of the motive of the crime of this case, the defendant's character and behavior, environment, family relationship, and the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the motive of the crime of this case; and that the defendant'

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow