1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff A is the father of the deceased D (hereinafter “the deceased”), the mother of the Plaintiff B, and the Plaintiff C is the birth of the deceased.

B. At around 18:00 on February 20, 2017, the Deceased, while drinking alcohol with 2 her natives at the restaurant located in the Gu, Si, Si, si, and drinking alcohol, drinking alcohol with 2 her main points in the direction of 278 km in the Gu, Si, si, Si, si, si, and entering the history through Escra in the Gu, Si, si, Si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

At the time, the engineer G of the said train passed the border station of about 23:38 km on the same day and discovered that the deceased, etc. was killed and seated on the tracks at a point of about 100 km in front at a speed of about 87 km during the operation, and took measures such as immediately sounding the whistle and conducting an emergency control, etc., but the occurrence of the instant accident was not prevented due to the lack of the winter distance, and stopped after about 274 meters from the place of the accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 7 evidence, Gap evidence 13-2 through 4, 6 through 9, 11 through 15, 17 through 22, Eul evidence 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. The Deceased entered the platform through the mouth stairs, and the lower line was at a place less than 600 meters away from the old railway station. The Deceased was involved in the instant accident. The Deceased was entering the platform using the Gu railway stairs not equipped with a trial device, and was under the influence of alcohol.