beta
Text
1. On November 24, 2010, at around 22:20, the drilling accident of B and C vehicles in the street near the history of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government History.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. D, while entering into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff with respect to B vehicles and driving the said vehicle, around November 24, 2010, at around 22:20, when driving the said vehicle, D started stopping on the street near the Sail Station in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and caused the Defendant’s negligence of violating the duty to stop and stop on the street while driving the vehicle on behalf of the Defendant (hereinafter “instant accident”).
B. The Plaintiff paid KRW 7,613,545 in total as the Defendant’s hospital treatment costs due to the instant accident.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, 13, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The summary of the parties' assertion argues that the accident in this case is not caused by the accident in this case, but caused by the accident in minor circumstances that did not occur on the part of the collision, and that even if disability is recognized, most of them are attributable to the defendant's king evidence, if the plaintiff deducteds the portion of contribution to king's contribution, damages paid by the plaintiff (1,380,000 won), medical expenses paid by the plaintiff (7,613,545 won) from the amount of contribution to king's contribution, the plaintiff does not have an obligation to pay insurance money to the defendant in relation to the accident in this case.
As to this, the defendant suffered from injury such as 3-4, gale climatic and conical base, 3-4, gale climatic stress disorder, NOS, etc. due to the accident in this case, 94 days of hospitalized treatment and pain treatment. In addition, 15% for 3 years in the urology at the urology, 23% for 3 years in the urology at the urology, 30% for 5 years in the urology at the urology at the urology at the urology at the urology at the urology at the urology at the urology, 8,904,138 won in total, and 24,742,00 won in the treatment costs and medicine expenses up to now, and the defendant needs to pay 24,509,026 won in the future treatment costs to the plaintiff.