1. On March 13, 2015, the National Labor Relations Commission: (a) between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor on March 13, 2015, Annex 2014, Annex 2014 and Annex 217, respectively.

The plaintiff company, the purpose of which is securities business, etc., uses 750 regular workers.

The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor’s workers”) except for the Intervenor’s Union (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor’s Trade Union”) is serving in the Plaintiff Company.

The Intervenor Labor Union is a trade union by national unit, established on December 19, 2011, for all workers engaged in the affairs and financial business nationwide, and its branch (A branch, hereinafter “ Intervenor Labor Union”) was established in the Plaintiff Company on April 16, 2014.

In the part of the intervenor's union, approximately 230 workers, including the intervenor's workers, are joined as the members.

Plaintiff

On August 29, 2014, the Company issued a personnel order (hereinafter “instant personnel order”) to assign 20 workers, including the Intervenor, to door-to-door sales organizations (ODS; hereinafter “ODS”) on September 1, 2014.

17 of the 20 workers assigned to the organization of ODS following the instant personnel order is members of the Trade Union of the Intervenor, and the Intervenor B is the head of the branch office of the Trade Union of the Intervenor, the Intervenor H, the secretary general of the Secretariat, the Intervenor N, and the chief director of the Trade Union of the Intervenor, the Intervenor N, and the Intervenor T are in charge of the duties of the chief director of the Trade Union.

On September 22, 2014, the Intervenor and U (the Intervenor was issued a personnel order as an ODS organization as well as the Intervenor’s employees but was not affiliated with the Intervenor Labor Relations Commission’s Trade Union) filed an application for remedy with the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission on September 22, 2014, as the instant personnel order constitutes unfair placement, conversion, and unfair labor practices (disadvantageous treatment, control, and intervention). The Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission recognized that the instant personnel order was unfair placement.

② The Plaintiff Company shall reinstate the Intervenor’s workers and U to its original position, and shall assign them to the foregoing workers.