logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.01.19 2016고단1475
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for six months with labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Support of the Daejeon District Court on December 4, 2015 and was sentenced to two years of probation on the 12th of the same month, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive and conclusive during the period of probation.

[Criminal facts]

1. On July 11, 2016, the Defendant damaged property: (a) around 02:20, Asan-si, Asan-si, 103-dong 1006, and D, the wife in front of the front corridor No. 1006, did not open the entrance door to open the entrance door; (b) on the part of the bridge located there, 324,000 won of repair costs by cutting the window in the direction of the corridor owned by the Korea Land and Housing Corporation.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. On July 11, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) while destroying windows and assaulting D at the places indicated in paragraph (1) around 03:10, as described in paragraphs 1 and 2, at the place indicated in paragraph (1); (b) the Defendant refused a request for returning home from the police officer F of the ASEAN E box of the 112, who was called out upon receipt of the 112 report, and entered into the apartment of the said 103 1006 103 106 103 103 100 100 100 100 10, 2016; and (c) whether the Defendant was a superior to F and G to enter the house;

I. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz.

경찰 건드리니 재밌네.

“At the same time, the chest and shoulder of the above F was pushed down by hand, and the chest of the above G was pushed down by several times, and was winded at the face.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made by the police in each of the police statements made to D, F, G, and H;

1. A statement in a written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on images of photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of each official duty);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The aggravated Criminal Act for concurrent crimes.

arrow