(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.02.04 2015고단3153

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.02.04 2015고단3153

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving Obaba in B.

On August 26, 2015, the Defendant, at the time of Busan-si, Seocheon-gu, Busan-si, 13:15, was driving along the road front of the 67 Incheon-si, Seocheon-gu, Seoul-do along the central line towards the border distance from telephone.

At that time, the defendant found that the victim C(45 tax) is driving an Ortoba and is proceeding in the station. In such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle, etc. had a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded ahead of the victim, and the left part of the victim's right side was shocked to the right part of the defendant's right side on the part of the defendant's right side, making the victim go beyond the ground.

Ultimately, even if the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as mination of mincule executives who need approximately eight weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The actual survey report, each photograph, generation report, accident video CD, diagnostic CD, written estimate, and investigation report (related to the Defendant’s previous offense) [the Defendant’s previous offense] was not shocked, and the Defendant heard music at the time of the accident, and was unaware of the accident.

However, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined in this court, i.e., ① the Defendant’s statement stating that “the injured party moved to the left side even if he changed the vehicle line in front of it, the injured party was in front of it, and even if he reported it, the injured party was aware that the accident occurred, the fact that he left the match is recognized, and ② the injured party was the victim.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2016.05.25 2016노603

-대구지방법원 2019.05.30 2018노635

-창원지방법원 2021.01.21 2020고정689

-서울서부지방법원 2017.09.14 2017고단470

-대전지방법원 2018.08.10 2018고정537