logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2021.01.21 2020고정689
보험사기방지특별법위반등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates an Obama in the name of "C" in Seongbuk-gu, Changwon-si.

1. Fraud D, E, the fact that a traffic accident was not caused, is the most probable cause of the traffic accident, and the insurance company would be entitled to claim insurance money to the insurance company. On April 20, 2015, the above D received the traffic accident insurance policy with the purport that “A parked E-owned Hababa, which was driven by G-to-be, while driving a G-to-be vehicle on the nearby road of the Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, would cause a collision,” although there was no traffic accident around April 20, 2015.

Since then, the above D and E have received insurance money by making a false estimate as if they were accepted without being accepted by the above "C", and divided them after receiving the insurance money.

On April 2015, the Defendant offered a proposal to the Defendant, and the Defendant, at the office of the above “C”, made a false estimate and claimed insurance proceeds from the damaged company, as if it had not been accepted without any actual acceptance.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D and E, claims insurance money by deceiving the damaged company, and he received 1,500,000 won from the damaged company on May 15, 2015 from the damaged company and acquired it by remittance of 1,50,000 won in the name of repair cost.

2. D and I, in violation of the Special Act on the Prevention of Fraud in Insurance Policy, have the intent to claim insurance proceeds to the insurance company by pretending to be the occurrence of a traffic accident, even though the occurrence of a traffic accident was not of the occurrence of the traffic accident. On February 9, 2017, D received the traffic accident insurance insurance to the effect that, although there was no traffic accident at issue on February 16 and 27, 2017, the traffic accident insurance was conducted by phone to the victim F, “Ack-gu, Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-gu, in case where a traffic accident occurred and the accident occurred.”

Since then, D and I have made a false estimate as referred to in the preceding paragraph and divided the insurance proceeds.

A defendant shall be presented to him, and the defendant shall be given.

arrow